voidreed:

radicalmathematical:

knaz16:

charmed-introvert:

Today the news of Mollie Tibbetts only further solidified just how much of a male preservation agenda both the left and right have.

When white men shoot up schools, the left is quick to say “white people are crazy. We need gun control.”

When brown men commit crimes (especially one that is not in the U.S “legally”) the right is quick to say “Mexicans are murderers. We need boarder control.”

The rigidness of which both sides ignore male violent patterns and try to make it about “race” is a testament to just how much politics is simply a game of “which patriarchy will dominate?”.

Mollie Tibbetts wasn’t murdered because of “illegal immigration” she was murdered because of MALE VIOLENCE.

What that man did to her is typical male behavior (stalking/ chasing her). This has nothing to do with “race”. I never hear stories of female “illegal immigrants” stalking and murdering random women.

I’m so sick to death of everyday turning on the news to see all the crime men committ against women, only for the left and right to make it a political war of “race”.

When you try to mask male violence as a “immigration problem” instead of calling it what it is “male violence” you ignore the root of almost all violent crimes.

When you say “white people are school shooters” you are masking the reality that mass shootings are done by MEN.

And I recall this post by @knaz16 about how all these politics of “race” is all about which patriarchy should reign.

Because if liberals and conservatives were really serious about decreasing these crimes they wouldn’t make it a race issue. They would recognize it’s a male issue. But they don’t because their fight for preserving their patriarchy would fall apart.

Hard to justify male violence as a race issue when every single race contains violent males.

For real, this post is so important bc it took me so loooong to notice it when it’s literally obvious

Leave a comment