sangredesirena:

nyshadidntbreakit:

The fash – sorry, I mean, “gender critical feminists” – are now hiding razorblades behind their vile stickers in Manchester and Leeds. Just like the fash.

But they’re definitely not the fash, right?

Stay safe, everyone. Use an implement or cover them up, don’t risk your fingers.

image
image

and finally, lets pray for our fallen comrade who has grievously injured themselves with an imaginary object in order to demonize radical feminists and further associate them with nazis which totes isnt like, an MRA tactic!

image

the-radical-buzzard-of-discourse:

violetdioxazine:

kittyit:

interesting how the title of the article was changed to “received a death threat” instead of the more active language of what actually happened included in the link – was threatened with a knife. if misgendering (even unintentional, non-malicious misgendering) is violence, this woman deserved to have a male coworker wielding a knife tell her “I’m going to kill you for calling me he.” does that sound right to you, really?

the fucking coddling that the company is doing. theyre going out of their way to defend a deranged man wielding a knife. 

also, this part really fucking annoyed me:

“luckily, the death threat occurred around 6pm, when there weren’t any customers in the story” HOW IS THAT FUCKING LUCKY FOR THE VICTIM? LIKE SERIOUSLY? HOW IN ANY WAY IS THAT LUCKY?

“Luckily, no one was around to witness a women nearly being murdered with a knife, because good heavens, wouldn’t that be embarrassing! Thankfully she had the decency to almost get stabbed in private, like a respectable lady should!”

Lmao at kweers pretending that mogai queer theory had nothing to do with the creation of 1,000 micro identities for pedophiles.

larpsandtherealgirl:

toxicpride-humblecoward:

ouma-against-dickheads:

That wasnt mogai, that was the “map” community

When? When did this happen???

Queer theorists have been pushing “pedophiles” as a “marginalized orientation” for a very long time

“It is harder for most people to sympathize with actual boy-lovers.

Like communists and homosexuals in the 1950s, boylovers are so stigmatized that it is difficult to find defenders for their civil liberties, let alone for their erotic orientation. Consequently, the police have feasted on them.

Local police, the FBI, and watchdog postal inspectors have joined to build a huge apparatus whose sole aim is to wipe out the community of men who love underaged youth.

In twenty years or so, when some of the smoke has cleared, it will be much easier to show that these men have been the victims of a savage and undeserved witch hunt.”

A quote from the founding document of queer theory by Gayle Rubin, who believes that pedophiles are victims of social stigma and police intervention.

And in case you think this is an isolated incident:

“Any child old enough to decide whether or not she or he wants to eat spinach, play with trucks, or wear shoes is old enough to decide whether or not she wants to run around naked in the sun, masturbate, sit in someone’s lap, or engage in sexual activity“

-Third-wave feminist author and trans-identified female Pat Califia, who later stated that pedophiles should be more – not less – invested in children’s lives.

rad-and-i-dont-stop:

officialweatherwax:

rainfelt:

cardozzza:

notyourexrotic:

(source)

Whoa, I didn’t realize that it was so deliberate, I honestly thought it was unconscious

Scary, scary.

I always thought they were mad at me for having my own desires. But yeah, it was probably also their clever plan being thwarted.

Literally the only way I ever got out of those was by talking about how I had to drive 30 minutes home on the freeway and didn’t want to deal with the cops (a big problem here). There was even one man who bought me a dollar beer and I spoke to him for an hour until my friends came to get me and go to another bar. He got so pissed and literally held on to me as I tried to leave. The fuck thought he had bought me for a $1 beer!

gardenburger:

strawberrylollipopkisses:

“Stevie Nicks surrounds herself with girls. Wherever she goes, she brings girls. “I can’t imagine you in a bathing suit,” someone says in an interview for Rolling Stone, when Stevie says she likes to play in the pool in her backyard. “Yeah, well, you never will,” Stevie says. “And there is never — ever — a man in the backyard. If there is, he is banished to the front of the house.” Men don’t get to look at Stevie Nicks unless Stevie Nicks wants men to look at Stevie Nicks.”

— (via bjorkdoll)

this just in: stevie nicks is literally the goddess artemis

You lesbian terfs will be, in 20 years, the political equivalent of white republicans today. Have fun with that downward spiral.

vtervs:

spencer-shayy:

lesbian-venting:

~1000 years ago – lesbians were getting raped by men for not liking dick

~100 years ago – 

lesbians were getting raped by men for not liking dick, and also pathologized for it

~50 years ago (-present in most countries) – lesbians getting institutionalized and raped by men for not liking dick

~5 years ago – lesbians can get married in some western countries!  but also throughout most of the world they can still be legally killed and raped, and even where gay marriage is legal men still fucking treat us like sex toys.

~in 20 years according to this bozo – lesbians will literally be like powerful racist white people who’ve been colonizing and economically people from other countries.  The reason they are like this is because they don’t like dick.  This is a very smart analogy.

Personally I would love to know how is lesbians will be able to gain as much power, privilege, and influence as white republicans.

We don’t like dick so we will gain enough power to oppress people? How does that make sense?

So according to anons theory, in 20 years feminists will replace old white republicans in the political sphere? How is this a ‘downward’ spiral? Seems too good to be true to me. Lol

feijoaaas:

if straight girls knew of even half of how much lesbians and bisexual girls hold themselves back and restrain themselves and dilute themselves in order to appear non-threatening and non-predatory to those same straight girls

once we’ve made you aware of our orientation, we barely allow ourselves to look at you and smile at a joke you just told, in case you’d assume we’re into you, just because we smiled at you once

but guys can catcall, make inappropriate comments, talk about girls as trophies, talk about how they ‘become a real man’ only after they’ve had sex the first time, break girls down into body parts, take revealing clothing as an open invite for sexual interest, go on about how good they are in bed after receiving an initial ‘no’ as if their dick is a product that the girl just doesn’t know she wants yet and the guy didn’t sell it on his first try??? and many more things

@ straight girls, please. please. take your homophobic hypocrisy and realise that girls who like girls are not your enemy.

if we flirt with you, because not all of us have amazing gaydar and sometimes we just gotta try, and you’re not into us?
if you just say so, the most likely scenario is that we will sincerely apologise and then move to the other side of the room or in any other way leave you as well alone as we possibly can.

we are not your enemy.

and we don’t like girls just because you’re girls.
you are not body parts.
you are not a trophy.

we don’t call your outfit cute because we want to get between your legs.

you are not new territory that we want to conquer.
you are not an area on a map that we want to mark with an “x” so we can brag about how we’ve been there.

you are not a pussy that we want to defeat.

the predatory lesbian and the hyper-sexualised bisexual is a myth.

we are
not
your
enemy.