I don’t give a fuck about no emotional wreck. Don’t give a fuck about her being tired.
Quest summed up my thoughts perfectly.
This shit don’t add up.
This story makes no damn sense. How do u go to the wrong apartment? Wasn’t there a apartment number on the door? What intruder opens the door to let you in? She doesn’t know what the hell the inside of her apt looks like? There’s way more going on here. Fuck her feelings! RIP Mr Jean
She had to be under the influence of something. Still does not cover right to pull out her gun on a black man and kill him dead. #RecklessManslaughter
No. We are not going down that route. No fucking excuses. She was not under the influence of anything but racism and apparently rejection.
Someone posted a photo of her and the victim saying he was her ex and she showed up drunk, beating on the door telling him to open it and he was refusing so she shot through the door and killed him.
Alrighty. I have enough information to rewrite the title.
Crazed ex-girlfriend cop MURDERS ex boyfriend by using spare key and then claimed to not have known the man.
I’ve been seeing this and neighbors had reported hearing what they describe as “cop talk” of the officer shouting/demanding “OPEN THIS DOOR!” and that was reported in early reports which makes the idea of “oh she just walked in accidentally” entirely implausible if she was demanding entry.
Police are hiding shit. The fact they’ve been trying to paint this as a simple accident is so damning. I expect so much shit to come out and the whole police department is gonna look so bad for being complicit
This was a hit. Plain and simple. Premeditated.
They expected us to accept that sorry ass story and go on about our lives.
Never trust man who ‘allows’ you to be friends with other men/dress however you like/work. If he thinks he’s giving permission he also thinks he can deny it.
the fact that jojo siwa is 5’9 is legitimately terrifying this child could fucking curbstomp me
Sometimes I purposely have headphones in with no actual music to stop people from trying to talk to me. Enraging.
I had to stop reading. this made my brain hurt. if she has head phones leave her alone. if she is me leave me alone always and forever
This is rape culture
Lol unless you’re telling her the bus is here, it’s the last stop on a train, or some pertinent information, leave the damn woman and her headphones the fuck alone.
Fixed it.
Thank you I was about to throw my phone at a wall
Okay but… can someone tell me why this is so bad? I mean, all the article told you (as a guy) to do is walk up to a girl with headphones on, motion for her to take them off, and pay her a nice and non-creepy compliment. It then tells you to tell her you have somewhere to go soon, so that the girl in question doesn’t feel crowded or like she’s in a conversation she can’t get out of.
This seems perfectly fine to me… is there some subtext I’m missing or something??
Women get approached in public a lot.Usually this is unwanted. One of the things women now do to combat this is to make themselves unapproachable, and one of the best ways to do that is to have on headphones. Lots of women wear headphones even if they aren’t listening to music, just to avoid unwanted advances from men they don’t feel like talking to.
This article is basically saying, “how to get around the physical barrier women have put up so they don’t have to talk to you.” It’s the equivalent of “Oh, she built a moat? well here’s how to build a bridge!”
It’s assumptive, it’s entitled, and it furthers the idea that men deserve to talk to women no matter what the woman herself actually wants. It’s giving men tools to try to knock down barriers women have put up deliberately to avoid having to interact with them. It’s creepy as fuck, it’s rude, and it’s furthering rape culture–ie the idea that men have a right to a woman’s time, body, etc.
There are times and places women may wish to be approached. But if they have in headphones, it’s a damn good bet this isn’t one of them, so concocting strategies to approach them anyway is ignoring their wishes in favor of the man’s, and that’s not okay.
“women love to test guys to see how confident they really are and a favorite test of women is to ignore a guy’s attempts to converse with her and see what he will do next; will he walk away in shame or will he insist on a confident, easy-going manner?”
Y’all think that’s what we’re doing? We are not pretending to ignore you to size you up, we are ignoring you cause we DON’T WANT TO TALK TO YOU. What you see as a “confident, easy-going manner” we see as an entitled and slightly creepy attitude. There are many places a man can go to find a woman who wants to talk to him. A place like the bus, train, or a cafe when the woman is wearing headphones is NOT one of them.
This article is infuriating. The kind of person who is going to follow this advice isn’t the kind of person who can respect personal space. Not the kind of person I want to give my time to, or the kind of person any woman/AFAB owes time to.
Here are the latest edits the author of the article made. Check this load of bullshit out, people.
drug addicts (who need help + support, not prison time)
protesters/activists
poc who get arrested 4 doing things white people would never get arrested 4 doing
rape/incest/abuse/etc victims who kill their attackers (self defense)
homeless people who are just chilling + not doing anything illegal (like a homeless person is just sleeping + the cops arrest them 4 some dumb reason)
a lot of people, actually (ex. people who steal like a single apple bc they’re starving, people who take animals from abusive owners, squatters, undocumented immigrants with no/minor criminal records, prostitutes + sex workers, poor people, the mentally ill, etc)
The fact that this post is controversial on tungle dot hellsite says a lot about the site’s political environment.
Another thing that’s grievously wrong with today’s mainstream feminism/social justice is just the complete inability to name male violence and men as a whole as a problem. It’s always “cis men” or “white men” or “straight boys”. It’s never men.
Earlier on Twitter I saw a quote tweet of a photo of some Italian screen writer or something wearing a shirt that said “Weinstein is innocent” and the person who quote tweeted it ended with “white men really are the worst” and it’s just… an avoidance of naming the problem. If you stick “white” on there, you’re making it a race issue. You’re making it seem like this mans defense of a serial rapist and abuser is because he is white, not because he’s a man. As if black men, Asian men, Latino men, etc would never say such a thing which is just… wrong. And it’s not “problematic” to say that.
It absolves him of responsibility as a man in a way while muddling the conversation, and it takes away our ability to come together and name the source of this problem, which is men. But modern SJ makes naming male violence as a problem “problematic.”
Let’s be clear. There is nothing harmless about “sex dolls.” They represent the ultimate debasement of women. They represent yet another level of society’s detachment from its responsibility to value, respect, and protect women. “Sex dolls” are a manifestation of porn culture and the male dominant society’s belief that it needs to do whatever it can to make sure men can have sex when and however they want it no matter at what cost.
How is this. To glaringly obvious to everyone when ALL sex dolls are female???? You don’t see this huge market of women wanting to fuck plastic representations of men now do you? You don’t see sex dolls marketed to lesbians. No, sex dolls are made specifically for straight men, who stopped seeing women as human centuries ago.
Big Mean Sweaty Dyke 