When men talk of women and girls in terms of legal/not legal, what they’re really saying is “I already sexually objectify this child and would attempt to fuck her if there were no laws in the way.”
You can’t deny that is fucking scary.
Um you do realize that the ONLY reason that the age of consent exists is to prevent children & adults from having sex because they would do it like rabbits if there was no law against it.
Why do you think it’s bad that these people admit that they are obeying the law but would do the thing it prohibits if it weren’t a law.
Lots of people would murder if there was no law.
Many people would steal if there were no law.
So you mean adult men would rape children with no thoughts if it weren’t illegal? Are you saying that men (99% of violent criminals) are just dying to break the law and hurt other people? Please do elaborate.
Honestly, probably. & I believe that statistic is incorrect but for the sake of discussion let’s say it’s true, wouldn’t that indicate to you that men ARE desperate to do evil disgusting things but the only thing stopping them is fear of consequences be they physical or metaphysical in nature be it prison or hell or negative karma or whatever. Humans not just men but all humans would do those actions which are against the law if there weren’t a law, that’s the only reason such laws exist. If laws didn’t exist society would crumble into anarchy, drug use & rampant fornication & that would only be reduced by the fear of STDs just look at how much people were fucking and using back in the 70’s before the fear of aids came about, seriously humans give in to their demons faster than you can say boo when there isn’t any fear of reprisal. I’m sure the sales of beef skyrocketed when the pope lifted the restrictions on eating meat on Friday. People are only as virtuous as society dictates. I personally wouldn’t rape because I don’t want to because I know how traumatic it is but if there were no sexual harassment laws I would grope any big boobies I see because I’m so starved of physical contact but I don’t do it because I understand it’s a form of sexual assault and tantamount to rape so even if it were declared legal I probably wouldn’t do it except for in extreme circumstances of boobs bigger than my head or something like that. I may be a pervert but I have my limits I’m just saying most people don’t or have much lower standards because I honestly am virtuous however if they abolished the age of consent I wouldn’t pursue a relationship with a child but if a girl hit on me I wouldn’t care about her age. & I’m fairly certain most men would tell you the same most would probably draw the line at say 14-16 somewhere in there personally I would probably draw the line at 10 but I would flirt with anyone that started it without fear of their parents beating me up. I’m sorry to drivel on like this but I’m bored.
“If there were no sexual harassment laws I would grope any big boobies I see”
“I would probably draw the line at 10 years old, but I’d flirt with someone younger than that”
So the only reason you don’t go around sexually harassing and assaulting women and children is due to the law. That’s really sad and scary, thanks for reaffirming that we should be scared of men. Only men think like this, you say you have morals but would not hestitate to have sexual contact or discussions with CHILDREN UNDER 10.
“…without fear of their parents beating me up.”
Even if there was no age of consent, most parents are still going to beat the shit out of you if you hit on their children, man. It’s not the law that makes me want to protect my kid from pedophiles.
Published
Big Mean Sweaty Dyke 