extremeirrelevancy:

If you remove biological femaleness from the definition of “woman” you’re left with stereotypes related to femininity.

If you then try to remove the stereotypes, you’re left with a word that defines absolutely nothing, and is useful to no one.

And making a word that is important to the discussion of systematic oppression into meaningless window dressing is fucking bullshit.

agneswsblog:

bpdjedis:

feminismandhappiness:

a-cute-potsexual:

hashtagdion:

Tumblr in 1860 probably: Please remember that some people NEED their slaves due to disabilities that prevent them from performing labor on their own. Don’t shame disabled slave owners. 

liberal feminists on tumblr in 1860: have you ever considered that some slaves LIKE working on the plantations, and some female slaves CHOOSE to have sex with their masters?

Some slaves want freedom and some slaves want to perform unpaid labor and be property, and that is OK too. Freedom is about CHOICE 💖🌌👠🔥😉 👌 👍

#‘here are 10 slaveowners of color who are changing the face of slavery’#‘why minstrel shows can be crucial in gaining positive poc of color representation’#‘anti-slavery is southernphobic and diminishes longstanding traditions’#‘if slavery is abolished then how will black people find jobs?’

Slave Exclusionary Radical Feminists (SERFS) deny slaves’ agency and infantilize them as helpless victims. End slavery stigma. Unpaid work is work.